s4291162
Wednesday, 13 June 2012
For the next couple of weeks of lectures I'm going through all my extensive notes to blog! (a bit late :) No lectures for week 9 and 10.
Week 13!
Whats in it for me?
My last lecture for Jour1111! How saddening! I have loved this course so much it has inspired me to take a dual degree in journalism arts next semester. We had a guest lecturer this week, Steve Molk an entertainment journalist, who owns "MolksTVTalk" which is an entertainment blog about Australian television.
The lecture was run like a question and answer type program where we had the chance to pick Mr Molk's brain about his experiences as a journalist. I learnt a lot about his life and he gave great advice about getting to be a paid journalist after uni. A perfect lecture to end the course
Week 12!
INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM
Love, love, loved this week! I'm really keen to take this subject next semester wahoo. Slighty devastated though because the lecture this week was meant to be on politics which is my life. Some big investigative journalism stories which i have studied during high school were Watergate and Wikileaks.
We learnt about investigative journalism by understanding the five 'ins'.
Informed
I as a journalist must understand all of the facts and background of the story - whose involved, when did it happen etc.
With a lot of experience a journalist will be able to rely on their instincts to decide if a situation is dangerous.I
Week 11!
AGENDA SETTING
Corporate Agenda - Issues that large business and corporations consider important.
Week 8!
ETHICS
When i heard todays lecture was going to be about ethics..i very nearly didn't come! I did some ethics study at school and found it incredibly dull. However this weeks lecture given by Mr John Harrison was surprisingly interesting, funny and informative. The lecture began with an engaging exercise, where we as the 'audience' had to view commercials and decide if they were unethical, ethical or in bad taste. In todays society where everything is regulated and political correctness is heavily monitored, i was surprised that some of the advertisements i deemed to be unethical where accepted.
Following on from this, we learnt about the Three Paradigms of Ehtics (three completely alien topics to me). The paradigms ( Deontology, Consequentialism, Virtue ) are the tools viewers use to decide if the material they view is ethical or not.
Week 13!
Whats in it for me?
My last lecture for Jour1111! How saddening! I have loved this course so much it has inspired me to take a dual degree in journalism arts next semester. We had a guest lecturer this week, Steve Molk an entertainment journalist, who owns "MolksTVTalk" which is an entertainment blog about Australian television.
The lecture was run like a question and answer type program where we had the chance to pick Mr Molk's brain about his experiences as a journalist. I learnt a lot about his life and he gave great advice about getting to be a paid journalist after uni. A perfect lecture to end the course
INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM
Love, love, loved this week! I'm really keen to take this subject next semester wahoo. Slighty devastated though because the lecture this week was meant to be on politics which is my life. Some big investigative journalism stories which i have studied during high school were Watergate and Wikileaks.
We learnt about investigative journalism by understanding the five 'ins'.
Informed
I as a journalist must understand all of the facts and background of the story - whose involved, when did it happen etc.
Intelligent
Before going 'full scale investigative' you need to make sure the story is good enough to be intruding and invading peoples homes and personal livesInside
Journalist needs to get intimate with the story and people involved.Intuitive
With a lot of experience a journalist will be able to rely on their instincts to decide if a situation is dangerous.I
Invest
A journalist must be willing to invest a lot of blood, sweat and tears into a story.Week 11!
AGENDA SETTING
This weeks lecture was all about Agenda Setting. I came into this lecture having no real idea about the concept or what the content of the seminar would be, but as always it was a super informative lecture! Our reading for this week was by Renita Coleman and titled 'Agenda Setting' (how relevant!). Coleman explained agenda setting as the 'process of the mass media presenting certain issues frequently and prominently with the result that large segments of the public come to perceive those issues as more important than others' so in short, news which is privileged consistently and often is seen by the public as being of greater importance than stories covered once. The ability for media to contort priorities of newsworthy items means they are shaping the public perception of reality, rather than simply reflecting upon it.
We learnt about four different types of Agenda's; Public, Policy, Cooperate and Media. Climate Change is an example of Agenda Setting, and relates to all four aspects.
Public Agenda - Are issues which the general public perceive as important
Policy Agenda - Aspects of society which politicians see as being of high importance or of particular interest to the public
Media Agenda - Stories discussed in the media
There are two apparent theories in regards to Agenda Setting, the first level is when emphasis is placed on major issues (e.g covered numerous times) and media is therefore suggesting focus be placed on the said issues. Second level is when the media drills in certain attributes of an issue ( how people should think about the issue)
Week 8!
ETHICS
When i heard todays lecture was going to be about ethics..i very nearly didn't come! I did some ethics study at school and found it incredibly dull. However this weeks lecture given by Mr John Harrison was surprisingly interesting, funny and informative. The lecture began with an engaging exercise, where we as the 'audience' had to view commercials and decide if they were unethical, ethical or in bad taste. In todays society where everything is regulated and political correctness is heavily monitored, i was surprised that some of the advertisements i deemed to be unethical where accepted.
Following on from this, we learnt about the Three Paradigms of Ehtics (three completely alien topics to me). The paradigms ( Deontology, Consequentialism, Virtue ) are the tools viewers use to decide if the material they view is ethical or not.
Deontological Ethics
Is the ethical position which assess the morality of material based on it's ability to abide by rules. It is often referred to as 'obligation' ethics. In journalism deontological ethics could refer to individuals obeying by the code to provide material which is accurate, fair and balanced.
Consequentialism
Is another class of ethics which is often contrasted against deontology, due to the fact that deontology comes from the rightness or wrongness from the behaviour of the individual itself rather than the outcomes of the conduct. Consequentialism however believes that the consequences of ones actions is the main basis for judgment on the rightness or wrongness of conduct. In journalism, misconduct is justified by consequentialism as it doesn't matter how the information is obtained, as long as it has been obtained.Virtue
Virtue Ethics describes the' character of a moral agent as a driving force for ethical behaviour,' rather than rules or consequences of the action. Dr Harrison explained that virtue ethics is all about 'intrinsic values' and a person who hold those values (hardworking, courageous, patient, honest) are better than journalist who follow ethical rules or only look at the consequences.
Abbott can almost taste victory
At this stage of the game, the only hope - and it is a very slim hope - for Gillard is that the gloss wears off some of the Coalition states before the election
Read more: http://www.canberratimes.com.au/opinion/abbott-can-almost-taste-victory-20120613-20a7u.html#ixzz1xibVjJg0
Monday, 21 May 2012
ANNOTATED
BIBLIOGRAPGHY
Moy, P. (2000).
Media Effects on Political and Social Trust. Journalism and Mass
Communication Quarterly , 77 (4), 744-759.
Current Editor-in-Chief of Oxford Bibliographies Online,
PH.D qualified, Professor of Communication and Adjunct Faculty in Political
Science, Patricia Moy, offers a credible and informative investigation into
how the media effects social and political trust. Moy highlights how over the
last 20 years we have seen a ‘crisis of confidence’ with individuals
expressing low levels of trust in government entities and other peoples. She
uses data from the American National Election Study from 1996 in her study, to
assess citizen’s level of trust in government and one another, and how trust
is subjective in accordance with media usage. According to Moy, the general
level of distrust stems from talk back radio, television and newspapers, constantly
reporting negatively and controversially upon politians. The author believes
that the rhetoric has the conceivable potential to delegitimize political
authority.
Courier Mail. (2012, May 11). Retrieved
from http://www.couriermail.com.au: http://www.couriermail.com.au/money/abbott-slams-budget-as-class-war/story-fn84ghwq-1226352418085
This article, sourced from the online Courier Mail site, has no cited author, which detracts credibility
from the source to an extent. The article reflects upon the Labor government’s
recent budget surplus announcement, from a liberal perspective, privileging the
opinions and accusations of their leader Tony Abbot, and silencing the voice of
the government. Instead of presenting an article which explores both sides of
the debate, this article is particularly one sided and contains immense bias.
The article quotes Abbot saying, the "Government should
protect the vulnerable, not to create more clients of the state but to foster
more self-reliant citizens," This quotation, as Moy describes, creates a
level of distrust in the public; ‘isn’t the government meant to protect the
vulnerable?’ ‘Are they abusing power?’. The way in which the article is
constructed (presenting one negative view) is one example of how negative publicity
can act as a catalyst for citizen distrust in the government. Bearing this in
mind, the Courier Mail is a commercial newspaper
owned by Rupert Murdoch, which routinely means
that it’s main concern is to produce newsworthy stories. Therefore articles are
often sensationalised and profoundly negative to swell public concern in the
government, and buy news to become ‘informed’ on the matter.
ABC. (2012, May 8). http://www.radioaustralia.net.au.
(Australian Network News) Retrieved from http://www.radioaustralia.net.au/international/2012-05-08/treasurer-wayne-swan-delivers-the-australian-budget/940302
ABC Radio National provides a verbal account on the 2012 Australian
Budget. ABC is a not-for-profit network, which aims to produce factual,
balanced, unexaggerated news stories. Dissimilar to the other two texts, the ABC
provides the audience with succinct information about the budget without
victimizing, privileging or marginalizing any parties involved. The broadcast
begins with the Australian treasurer Wayne Swan, providing a list of benefits
of the surplus budget, then moves on to highlight the concerns some may have
with the budget such as large cuts to International aid and the defense force. The
broadcast positions viewers to make take an informed stance on the budget,
whether to support it or not, but doesn’t suggest which view in more favorable.
The transmission aired a particularly relevant quote by speaker Peter Slipper‘
it is unfortunate that trial by media, seems to have become the order of the
day in this country’ (Slipper 2012). The quote highlights how influential the
media can be upon public opinion in relation to politics. This broadcasts emphasizes the differences
between commercial media and public media in politics, how commercial media
concerns itself with the production of newsworthy stories and the latter is
dedicated to wholesome and informative publications.
Sloan, J. (2012, May 6). The Bolt Report.
Channel Ten (A. Bolt, Interviewer) http://www.wakeup2thelies.com/2012/05/07/labors-budget-is-about-as-honest-as-their-no-carbon-tax-promise/
Host Andrew Bolt, is
associate editor of the Herald Sun, columnist, blogger, TV host and radio
commentator who describes himself as "conservative" but
rejects the label "right-wing" (Bolt, 2010) . He is highly
respected journalist and hosts his own show The
Bolt Report on commercial station, channel 10. Bolt opens his show by
highlighting several of Labour’s promise ‘backflips’ since 2007, from Rudd’s
promise of 3 precent defence increases over a decade, to Gillard’s 2 billion defence
cut only 3 years later, and highlights labours opinion change in
one week from protecting Peter Slipper and Craig Thompson, claiming they were
innocent, to suspension from the Labour party. Bolt’s aim in this segment is to
illustrate Labour’s apparent ‘inability to keep a promise’. He does this
through play on words such as ‘here comes the bribe’ and the ‘Fudget 2012’ and generalisations
like ‘Gillard has run out of our trust and our money’ Judith Sloan
supports Bolt by pointing out ‘tricks’ the government is using to return the
budget to a surplus. By the conclusion of the segment the audience is left
questioning the legitimacy of the government.
Bibliography
ABC.
(2012, May 8). http://www.radioaustralia.net.au. (Australian Network
News) Retrieved from
http://www.radioaustralia.net.au/international/2012-05-08/treasurer-wayne-swan-delivers-the-australian-budget/940302
Bolt, A. (2010, April 9). "If I were of the Right, I’d
say so". . Herald Sun.
Courier Mail. (2012, May 11). Retrieved
from http://www.couriermail.com.au:
http://www.couriermail.com.au/money/abbott-slams-budget-as-class-war/story-fn84ghwq-1226352418085
Moy, P. (2000). Media Effects on
Political and Social Trust. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly
, 77 (4), 744-759.
Sloan, J. (2012, May 6). The Bolt Report.
http://www.wakeup2thelies.com/2012/05/07/labors-budget-is-about-as-honest-as-their-no-carbon-tax-promise/.
(A. Bolt, Interviewer)
Monday, 14 May 2012
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)